Why don’t you lie down for a while?

The after­noon nap has always been a con­tro­ver­sial topic. Its oppon­ents see it as the ulti­mate expres­sion of lazi­ness, while its pro­pon­ents view it as a cata­lyst for crea­ti­vity and pro­duc­ti­vity. The lat­ter point to his­to­ri­cal figu­res such as Aris­totle, Albert Ein­stein and Leo­nardo da Vinci, who are said to have drawn energy from power naps, even though the term ‘power nap’ did not exist back then. They also cite count­ries where the siesta is con­side­red part of the cul­tu­ral heri­tage. Now, rese­arch backs them up as well. A new study shows that even short peri­ods of sleep lead to mea­sura­ble chan­ges in the brain that sub­se­quently make us more recep­tive.

The results sug­gest that nap­ping puts the brain in a state that enables us to store new infor­ma­tion more quickly.

To under­stand this, it helps to take a gene­ral look at the brain. The adult brain con­ta­ins around 86 bil­lion neu­rons, which is more than ten times the num­ber of peo­ple on Earth. These neu­rons are inter­con­nec­ted in the brain like a fine-mes­hed net­work. Infor­ma­tion con­stantly flows along these con­nec­tions, known as syn­ap­ses, in the form of elec­tri­cal curr­ents and neu­ro­trans­mit­ters such as sero­to­nin and dopa­mine. During the day, as we learn or expe­ri­ence new things, this net­work is con­stantly chan­ging. Some con­nec­tions become stron­ger and new ones form.

If you remem­ber a con­ver­sa­tion, it’s partly because the con­nec­tions bet­ween neu­rons in cer­tain regi­ons of the brain have been streng­the­ned. In rese­arch terms, this is known as neu­ro­pla­s­ti­city — the brain’s ability to con­stantly rewire its­elf. This enables us to learn a new lan­guage, mas­ter new motor skills or even change see­mingly ing­rai­ned beha­viours later in life.

In recent years, rese­arch has shown that neu­ro­pla­s­ti­city occurs in a rhyth­mic man­ner. As new sti­muli flood the brain during the day, exis­ting con­nec­tions are streng­the­ned and new ones are for­med. This pro­cess requi­res con­sidera­ble energy and space. Howe­ver, both of these resour­ces are limi­ted. It’s as if you were scribb­ling more and more on a chalk­board until even­tually the­re’s no more space left and it all beco­mes meanin­g­less. Then, in the evening, we sit on the sofa with a heavy head.

At some point, you have to wipe away some of those scribbles. On the one hand, to make room. On the other hand, it’s to store wha­t’s rele­vant. In the brain, this hap­pens at night while we sleep. Past expe­ri­ments have shown that unneces­sary syn­ap­ses are then bro­ken down or shrink to main­tain a balance. This pro­cess is known as syn­ap­tic home­osta­sis.

This rai­ses the ques­tion of whe­ther even a short nap can res­tore order to the brain. To inves­ti­gate this, brain waves were mea­su­red using an EEG. Cer­tain signals can be used to deter­mine the over­all strength of the syn­ap­tic net­work, i.e. how stron­gly the neu­rons are con­nec­ted to one ano­ther. As expec­ted, this net­work strength increased in par­ti­ci­pants who had been awake for lon­ger. Howe­ver, the mea­su­re­ments also showed that even a short period of sleep was enough to reduce net­work strength again.

This sug­gests that syn­ap­ses reor­ga­nise them­sel­ves during a nap. In a sub­se­quent expe­ri­ment, the rese­ar­chers attempted to sti­mu­late the nerve cells in the par­ti­ci­pants’ cere­bral cor­tex that con­trol move­ments in the ball of the thumb, from out­side the skull. They initi­ally set the coil to a low inten­sity, gra­du­ally incre­asing it until move­ment of the thumb could be detec­ted. The wea­ker the con­nec­tions bet­ween the syn­ap­ses, the more energy is requi­red extern­ally to sti­mu­late the nerve cell and trig­ger a move­ment.

Indeed, for par­ti­ci­pants who had taken a nap, the coil had to be set to a hig­her inten­sity. Sleep had wea­k­ened their net­work strength by pru­ning unneces­sary syn­ap­ses.

Over the past few years, rese­ar­chers have con­duc­ted a series of mouse expe­ri­ments to deter­mine the ext­ent of neu­ral remo­del­ling that occurs during sleep, i.e. how many of the brain’s con­nec­tions remain con­stant and how many change on a daily basis. This rese­arch is inte­res­t­ing because it reve­als just how mal­leable the brain is on a daily basis. It sug­gests that we may be much more men­tally fle­xi­ble than many peo­ple rea­lise. For exam­ple, one group demons­tra­ted that the cont­act area bet­ween syn­ap­ses was almost a fifth smal­ler after sleep than before. They also found that almost four out of five syn­ap­ses in the stu­died brain regi­ons shrank, while only one in five remained unch­an­ged.

What has not yet been inves­ti­ga­ted is whe­ther the chan­ges in the brain mea­su­red after a nap actually improve par­ti­ci­pants’ per­for­mance. Howe­ver, a num­ber of review stu­dies demons­trate this. These stu­dies show that par­ti­ci­pants were more alert and cogni­tively capa­ble after a nap. For ins­tance, they were bet­ter able to remem­ber num­ber sequen­ces or words, and they reac­ted more quickly to cer­tain sti­muli. These posi­tive effects were mea­sura­ble in a meta-ana­ly­sis of all the par­ti­ci­pants stu­died. This held true regard­less of age, and applied to both regu­lar nap­pers and those not accus­to­med to doing so. Accor­ding to a NASA study, even pilots per­form bet­ter during the landing approach of a long-haul flight if they have nap­ped before­hand.

There are no spe­ci­fic tips for the per­fect nap, such as how long you should lie down for or when you should do it. Sleep requi­re­ments vary greatly from per­son to per­son. Some peo­ple need ten hours a day, while others manage on five. This is pro­ba­bly why it’s hard to find defi­ni­tive advice, even in stu­dies. In one such study, rese­ar­chers exami­ned dif­fe­rent nap dura­ti­ons and con­cluded: ‘Even though there is no sin­gle best nap length, a 30-minute nap seems to offer the best com­pro­mise bet­ween prac­ti­cal­ity and bene­fit.’

Latest articles

Related articles

spot_img